You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Produce company plans to go forward at former Dairyland site
alert top story

Produce company plans to go forward at former Dairyland site

{{featured_button_text}}

Owners of a longtime wholesale produce firm in Kenosha will be able to move forward with plans to relocate on the former Dairyland Greyhound racetrack site.

The Kenosha City Council voted 11-5 in favor of a certified survey map that would allow Zilber Group developers to subdivide the property into two lots, one for the future home of Heartland Produce on about 32 acres at the corner of 60th Street and 104th Avenue.

The second property, on about 164 acres, to the north and west would accommodate Project Greeneway, at the former dog track at 5522 104th Ave.

Zilber expects to establish Greeneway with a 360-unit apartment complex, industrial buildings, a business park and retail development.

Heartland, a wholesale produce distributor in the area since 1994, is currently at 4550 70th Ave., but plans to sell its building to move into the Zilber development once built.

Opposition to split

The plans to split the property, however, had opposition as some council members again raised several issues brought forth during vetting at Public Works Committee and Plan Commission meetings last month.

Among them was whether the Forest County Potawatomi, financial backers of Zilber’s Project Greeneway development, would agree to waive its sovereign immunity, especially as it pertains to tax collection.

Ald. Jan Michalski moved to deny approval because of the uncertainty the city still faces not having such an agreement already in place.

“A number of the commissioners had a lot of issues with this. But for me, the primary issue was a matter of immunity,” he said. “This is part and parcel of the whole process,” he said.

While Mayor John Antaramian, who has experience dealing with the issue with another sovereign nation during his past dealings with the failed Menominee proposed casino at the site, has offered some assurances the deal would not be done without the waive, Michalski would rather have an “iron clad” agreement in place.

“I think it would be much cleaner to approve the whole thing … with the sovereignty issue settled, iron-clad, with no question,” Michalski said.

Antaramian, who passed the gavel to Council President David Bogdala so that he could speak, said there is urgency to review and approve Heartland’s plans.

Antaramian said that the sovereign immunity issue would be dealt with in the future developer’s agreement and that the Potawatomi are willing to waive it.

“As far as I can guarantee, I can only tell you that there is potential loss of a major company to our community if we don’t move forward on this at this point in time,” he said referring to Heartland. “So, I would hope the council would approve this. We still have a long way to go on some of the other things, but the timing is important to how this has to be put together and move forward.”

Ald. Dominic Ruffalo, who represents the district where the new development would occur, said he was in favor of the development.

“Heartland Produce wants to go there. They’re a great Kenosha company. They want to expand their business. They want to locate, again, in the city of Kenosha,” he said. “They’re going to have a bigger presence in the city of Kenosha and in the 16th District.”

Ruffalo said, if the sovereign immunity waiver isn’t agreed to, he would fight “like hell” to stop the proposed development at the former Dairyland site.

“As far as this project (Heartland) goes, I’m behind it 100 percent for tonight,” he said.

The council then voted 10-6 turning down Michalski’s motion to deny.

Alderman criticizes developer

Before ultimately voting to approve the land division to facilitate Heartland’s plans, Bogdala roundly criticized the developer, Heartland and city staff not bringing forth information in a timely manner. The Plan Commission voted down the certified survey map because it didn’t have enough information about the effect of the new facility with traffic, building foot print and sight lines on nearby residential neighborhoods.

“There are a number of concerns … as it relates to where this is going to be located on the site, how it’s going to operate and how it’s going to impact the surrounding neighborhood,” Bogdala said. “I know we keep talking about the sovereign immunity, and that’s definitely an issue that needs to be put to bed.

“But there are a ton of other questions that need to be answered. … That, to me, is an even bigger issue than the sovereign immunity,” he said.

0
0
0
0
0

Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics