CYR: The meaning of impeachment
COMMENTARY

CYR: The meaning of impeachment

{{featured_button_text}}

Only the third impeachment trial of a president in our history.

These are the sort of words used by various media people to underscore and dramatize the alleged importance of the just concluded political performance in Washington, D.C. Delivered in solemn tones, the statement seems to carry great gravity and the weight of American history.

However, this is a misleading representation of our past – and our present. The impeachment and trials of Presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump both took place quite recently in historical terms, over the past quarter century.

The first presidential impeachment and trial in 1868 involved President Andrew Johnson, Abraham Lincoln’s successor. For a century thereafter, the experience was considered so terrible, so fraught with danger, and so discredited by the targeting of this President Johnson that there was no desire for repetition.

Johnson, a Democrat from Tennessee, was selected as Republican Lincoln’s running mate for the presidential campaign of 1864. He owned slaves, whom he freed in 1863, before slavery was formally fully abolished throughout the state. He was also committed to the preservation of the Union.

Lincoln picked Johnson for political reasons, reflecting the realities of partisanship and geography. A year of some of the most brutal fighting of our terribly costly Civil War lay ahead, but victory at last seemed a realistic possibility.

The president wanted a Southerner on the ticket who could ease the way of reconstruction and reintegration of the Southern states back into our nation. The two men ran on a National Union Party ticket rather than as Republicans.

Johnson had served as elected governor of Tennessee and in the U.S. House of Representatives. He was also military governor of the state after occupation by federal troops, and had additional solid military credentials.

Lincoln’s assassination in early April 1865, shortly after the surrender of Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia, the principal Confederate force in the East, transformed the political environment. Even Lincoln would have been sorely challenged in the Civil War’s aftermath, and Johnson quickly revealed his inadequacies for presidential leadership. Belligerent and inflexible, he soon became isolated politically and a target of Radical Republicans in Congress.

The Tenure of Office Act passed in 1867 over Johnson’s veto prevented the president from removing any officer of the government subject to Senate confirmation without the concurrence of that body. The president’s attempt to remove Secretary of War Edwin Stanton, a Radical Republican, resulted in impeachment. The law later was repealed.

The Senate vote to remove Johnson from office fell just one vote short of the two-thirds required. Republican Sen. Edmund G. Ross of Kansas provided that vote, ending his political career. Johnson survived but with no chance of a second term. Fortunately, U.S. military occupation of the South continued.

In total, this impeachment represented a bitter and destructively divisive capstone to the most costly war in our history, with approximately 600,000 dead over four years. Understandably, the collective lesson drawn by earlier generations of Americans was that impeachment was to be avoided if at all possible.

That was the situation for just over a century, until the grueling Watergate crisis of 1972-74 led to impeachment of President Richard Nixon, who resigned before any trial. The era also witnessed urban riots and violence, political assassinations, and the bitterly divisive Vietnam War.

During those years, public alienation grew, authority declined. This set the stage for a more casual, cynical view of impeaching a president.

Arthur I. Cyr is Clausen Distinguished Professor at Carthage College and author of “After the Cold War.” Contact acyr@carthage.edu.

0
0
0
0
0

Get Breaking News delivered directly to you.

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Do you think it is permissible to yell "fire" in a crowded movie theater in order to create a panic? How about whether it is legal to speak to a crowd and tell them to go out and shoot the first police officer they see, or homeless person or teacher? If you responded no to those questions, does that make you an opponent of the First Amendment and its ban on laws that abridge the freedom of ...

The COVID-19 virus is a human tragedy for many who have been affected by it and it's having a profound impact on the lives of a large part of the Chinese population. The impact on the rest of the world of the disease's dislocation of the Chinese economy is yet to be fully felt. Forecasts of only a modest impact on oil demand worldwide are far too optimistic. A comparison of the latest ...

California had the right idea when it moved its presidential primaries from June to March. The nation's most populous state needs to be relevant in the process of choosing the nominees for the two major political parties. But California, unfortunately, didn't only switch its presidential primary. It also moved its state and congressional elections up to March 3 as well. This earlier date could ...

Six in the morning, before the sun had even considered the possibility of rising, I sat in my car staring at my bleary reflection in the blood…

There are times we must urgently intervene to help our children, and there are times we urgently must intervene to help the adults who help children. Today is a day I desperately wish I could be doing both. Instead, in the case of one of those adults, I must hold my breath. That's because my friend and colleague, the child development specialist Yigit Aksakoglu, halfway across the world in ...

"So you ... defend terrorists?" This is a question that my fellow military commissions defense attorneys and I are often asked. When friends and family members wonder about the work I do representing a detainee held at Guantanamo Bay, I usually offer something quippy about defending "constitutional values" or "the rule of law," and quickly move on. After all, talking about our clients, who ...

"Vegan - isn't that a white thing?" For longer than I care to remember, this was a common response from anyone who learned about my vegan lifestyle. When hearing the word "vegan," they probably thought up images of hip, white people eating $10 avocado toast with a side of raw kale rather than me, with my natural locks and melanin existence, cooking up jerk tofu with a side of black-eyed peas. ...

Conservative Catholics, including some critics of Pope Francis, are doing a victory lap because the pope has not, as expected, endorsed the ordination of married men as priests in the Amazon region of South America. At a Vatican synod it in October, two-thirds of bishops from that area had supported an exception to Western Catholicism's celibacy requirement to deal with a severe shortage of ...

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics